NATO after the Wales Summit- challenges and opportunities for the next decade

0
958

Hotel Garden, Ohrid, 24-26th October, 2014

 

PROGRAM OF THE FIRST SESSION OF THE 2014/2015 SCHOOL OF PUBLIC POLICY |MOTHER THERESA| 

 

Day 1: 24th October

18:30-19:00 Opening of the First Session of the School of Public Policy |Mother Theresa|, Zhidas Daskalovski, Director of the School of Public Policy |Mother Theresa|

19:00 – 20:00 Lecture:“New Security Environment and NATO’s role as defined by the Wales Summit”

 

 

Lecturer: Barbora Maronkova, Programme Officer, NATO Public Diplomacy Division

20:00 – 21:30 Dinner

 

Day 2: 25th October

9:00 – 10:00 Breakfast

10:00-11:30 Lecture:“Regional Security Threats Challenges and Opportunities”

 

 

Lecturer: Prof. D-r Stojan Slavevski, President, Marshall Center Macedonia

11:30 – 12:00 Coffee break

12:00 – 14:00 Lecture:“Models of nexus between terrorism and transnational organized crime”

 

 

Lecturer:Prof. D-r Frosina Remenska, Faculty of Security

14:00 – 16:00 Lunch

16:00 – 17:30 Lecture:“Western Balkans and New Challenges on their paths in and toward NATO”

 

 

 

 

Lecturer: Arian Galdini, Professor and Head of Department of Business Administration in the Economic, Luarasi University

17:30 – 18:00 Coffee Break

18:00 – 19:00 Lecturer:”The NATO Concurrence in the Western Balkans: Strategic Cultures and Institutional Interests”

 

 

Lecturer: M-r Arba Bekteshi, EU Policy Expert, Ministry of European Integration, Albania

19:00 – 20:00 Dinner

20:30 – 22:30 Social event

 

Day 3: 26th October

09:00 – 10:00 Breakfast

10:00 – 11:30 Lecture:“NATO the Western Balkans and the Ukrainian Crisis”

 

 

 

Lecturer: Prof. Dr. Metodi Hadzhi Janev, Military Academy, Skopje, Macedonia

11:30 – 12: 00 Coffee break

12:00 -13:30 Alumni lecture:“Clouds of Ukrainian crisis over Macedonia? The necessity of a strategic partner on the Euro-Atlantic integration path?”….

 

 

 

Lecturer: Ljubica Pendaroska, Teaching assistant, Faculty of Law, European University

13:30 – 14:00 Evaluation

14:00 – 15:00 Lunch

15:00 – 16:00 Departure

 

  

 


EVALUATION


 
Content
Conference Content Items

Yes

No

No Opinion

Comments
Did you feel all of the speakers contributed to the conference positively?

95%

/

5%

 
Were all major topics of concern or importance addressed? (Expand in Comments section)

90%

10%

/

 
Did you have a favorite speaker or panel? (Expand in Comments section)

90%

10%

/

  1. 1.      MetodiHadziJanev,
  2. 2.      FrosinaRemenski
  3. 3.      LjubicaPendaroska
  4. 4.      Arian Galdini.
Were there any panels or speakers you felt were irrelevant or took away from your ability to benefit from the event? (Expand in Comments section)

65%

30%

5%

ArbaBekteshi ( not well prepared for the panel )
Did the agenda leave room for attendees to adequately raise concerns that were not necessarily a part of the agenda?

90%

10%

/

 
Were there any representatives not present or invited that you feel should have been?

30%

20%

50%

More international speakers; representatives of the media.
Scale-Based Items Scaled Rank

No Opinion

 
On a scale of 1-5, how satisfied were you with the seminar overall quality (Circle One)

          4.70     

 

 

 
On a scale of 1-5, how much do you feel you learned from the speakers’ presentations? (Circle One)     4.30  

 

 

 
On a scale of 1-5, how free did you feel to express yourself in terms of questions, comments or concerns? (Circle One)

4.60    

 

 

 
On a scale of 1-5, how important/relevant do you feel this event was in the context of the current state of international affairs? (Circle One)

4.50

 

 

 
On a scale of 1-5, how likely are you to return to a similar event hosted by this organization in the future? (Circle One)

4.75    

 

 

 
Execution
Conference Execution Items

Yes

No

No Opinion

Comments
Was the agenda well organized?

100%

/

/

 
Did you feel you had an adequate number of breaks?     95%     5%

/

 
Did you feel the breaks were an appropriate length?

95%

/

5%

 
Was time efficiently managed by the hosts/mediators during discussions and presentations?

100%

/

/

 
Did the hosts of the event allow for adequate time for attendees to pose questions or make comments?

95%

5%

/

 
Did the hosts of the event make you feel welcome and valued?

100%

/

/

 
Scale-Based Items Scaled Rank

No Opinion

 
On a scale of 1-5, how satisfied were you with the food and/or beverages provided? (Circle One) 4.65  

 

 
On a scale of 1-5, how satisfied were you with the location in terms of providing a comfortable seating?

4.55

 

 

 
On a scale of 1-5, how satisfied were you with the location’s ease of accessibility travel-wise? 4.80  

 

 
On a scale of 1-5, how satisfied were you with the seminar’s logistical execution/organization? 4.90